news

For Honor Review Roundup [Update]

For Honor Review Roundup [Update]

Ubisoft’s new medieval fighting game For Honor is out now, and as such, reviews have started hitting the web.

Unfortunately, the game has been hit by a number of issues, seemingly not allayed by the recent open beta. If you want to see some footage of the game running, check out our recent Let’s Play of the closed beta, or over 10 minutes of the game on its highest PC settings.

GameSpot has a For Honor review in progress up–we’ll be posting our final review once we’ve had a little more time to dive deep into the game’s fighting mechanics. Until then, check out the roundup below. We’ll continue to update this article as more final reviews come in.

  • Game: For Honor
  • Developer: Ubisoft
  • Platform: PS4, Xbox One, PC
  • Release: February 14
  • Price: US $60 / £45 / AU $100

GameSpot — No score (review in progress)

“One-on-one battles are fun and challenging for the way they punish you for thoughtless play. But this heavily contrasts with fighting For Honor’s AI minions, which frequently feel mundane; defeating them simply requires mindless swinging rather than the calculated execution of one-on-one combat. Fighting these “opponents” also proves middling due to the inability to lock onto them directly. More often than not you’ll find yourself swinging your weapon wildly at the air rather than hitting them.

[But] despite these evident shortcomings, For Honor already has the workings of a well-made multiplayer fighting game.” — Matt Espineli [Full review in progress]

IGN — No score (review in progress)

“For Honor is a unique and somewhat risky venture in this day and age of publishers being hesitant to stray far from the model of their proven hits. Like a delicious, gamified Turducken, it’s a brawler with the depth of a fighting game inserted into the body of a third-person action game, which is in turn stuffed into an online team-based objective game. And in my roughly 40 hours spent playing a combination of alpha and beta tests, it’s easy for me to say that For Honor’s combat system is the most tactically complete and flexible version of melee combat I’ve ever experienced.” — Brandin Tyrrel [Full review in progress]

PC Gamer — 74/100

“Outside of the fighting, however, For Honor is a needlessly bloated game. There’s a lot of tediously granular customisation, a tacky free-to-play-style storefront selling in-game currency for real-world money, and a tangle of ugly, confusing menus to wrestle through before you can get into a battle. And as time goes on, and those stalwart, hardcore players continue to hone their skills, it’ll be even more unwelcoming to newcomers. Stick with it, though, and you’ll find a rich, tactical fighting game with wonderfully weighty combat and hidden depths to uncover. But if you want something accessible you can easily dip in and out of, you may want to swear fealty to another lord.” — Andy Kelly [Full review]

Eurogamer — Recommended

“For Honor skews a bit too sharply towards defensive play at higher skill levels. Whatever the differences between characters, the safest approach is often to let the other person make the first move, then dodge or parry and deal out a vengeful drubbing. If the battle is not yet won, however, it’s off to a bloodthirsty beginning, and it’s worth bearing in mind the example of Rainbow Six: Siege – another terrific multiplayer effort from Ubisoft that wasn’t all it could be at release. It’s scruffier fixtures notwithstanding, this is one of the finest weapon-based fighting games I’ve encountered – a game of mindgames and reversals in which you’ll savour nothing quite so much as a glorious defeat.” — Edwin Evans-Thirlwell [Full review]

58 total views, 1 views today

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on VKEmail this to someoneShare on StumbleUponDigg thisShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageFlattr the authorShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestPrint this pageShare on Yummly
It's only fair to share...

You Might Also Like